Thanks for calling this to my intention. It looks like
the spec was ambiguous enough that it could be parsed
with a meaning that I did not intend. I'll comment further
on the JIRA issue and then clarify the spec.
We set up a groups.io
mailing list for the Interceptors
it would be best to pursue interceptors-specific topics
On 6/2/17, 11:12 AM, Kevin Sutter
Are we discussing the updated Interceptor spec here? I
know we had some discussions related to this update on
the Java EE mailing list, but since it was released as
part of the EJB family of specs, should we comment on
the EJB mailing list?
I ran this update past our CDI EG member and she discussed
it with the wider Weld community (RI). It sounds like
there is an issue with CDI and some of the proposed
updates. Weld opened the following spec issue, but I
thought it would be good to post to it to the wider
community to ensure that everybody can discuss it.
Maybe I'm doing that just be posting this message? :-)