|
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: JSR-375 Expert Group
Bill,
So the category of "trivial" changes you describe corresponds to the description of errata in your JCP Processes writeup?
That being the case, what JCP process applies to
Bill,
So the category of "trivial" changes you describe corresponds to the description of errata in your JCP Processes writeup?
That being the case, what JCP process applies to
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#636
·
|
|
Re: JSR-375 Session at JavaOne
And btw. there is at least one or the other Java EE 8 proposal to JVM-Con in late November, but nothing on JSR 375. I can't say how many slots the "Security" topic would get, but so far there's been
And btw. there is at least one or the other Java EE 8 proposal to JVM-Con in late November, but nothing on JSR 375. I can't say how many slots the "Security" topic would get, but so far there's been
|
By
Werner Keil
·
#635
·
|
|
Re: JSR-375 Session at JavaOne
No worries. As it looks like one or the other session (like this one;-) does flock in being approved a little later, it could be one on JSON (JSON-P 1.1 and JSON-B 1.0 combined, like Dimitry and I did
No worries. As it looks like one or the other session (like this one;-) does flock in being approved a little later, it could be one on JSON (JSON-P 1.1 and JSON-B 1.0 combined, like Dimitry and I did
|
By
Werner Keil
·
#634
·
|
|
Re: JSR-375 Session at JavaOne
Hi Werner,
Yes, it's been approved.
Thanks for the offer, but I'd actually like to keep this as a single-speaker talk -- it wasn't pitched as a panel or BOF, and I believe the
Hi Werner,
Yes, it's been approved.
Thanks for the offer, but I'd actually like to keep this as a single-speaker talk -- it wasn't pitched as a panel or BOF, and I believe the
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#633
·
|
|
Re: JSR-375 Session at JavaOne
All,
Thanks for letting us know. Has the session as such been approved?
Like Ivar I do not necessarily need to have a talk, but since I gave several JSR-375 presentations at CodeMotion, Java2Days or
All,
Thanks for letting us know. Has the session as such been approved?
Like Ivar I do not necessarily need to have a talk, but since I gave several JSR-375 presentations at CodeMotion, Java2Days or
|
By
Werner Keil
·
#632
·
|
|
JSR-375 Session at JavaOne
All:
Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend JavaOne in October, so can't present the session that I'd planned.
Fortunately, Ivar Grimstad will be attending, and has agreed to
All:
Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend JavaOne in October, so can't present the session that I'd planned.
Fortunately, Ivar Grimstad will be attending, and has agreed to
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#631
·
|
|
Re: Need to resolve outstanding issues with LdapIdentityStore
Thanks, Guillermo. Comments inline.
Agree, and although the spec isn't clear about the need for exceptions, it does state pretty clearly what NOT_VALIDATED is for, and the purpose
Thanks, Guillermo. Comments inline.
Agree, and although the spec isn't clear about the need for exceptions, it does state pretty clearly what NOT_VALIDATED is for, and the purpose
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#630
·
|
|
Re: Need to resolve outstanding issues with LdapIdentityStore
Hi,
I prefer to throw exceptions at this moment so we can decide on a future version wether it's preferrable to create a VALIDATION_ERROR result, or if deployment validation is achievable and
Hi,
I prefer to throw exceptions at this moment so we can decide on a future version wether it's preferrable to create a VALIDATION_ERROR result, or if deployment validation is achievable and
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#629
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Exactly. As you may know, Java EE contained two specs related to security:
- JASPIC, for authentication
- JACC, for authorization
Aside of that, every spec contained its own security related features
Exactly. As you may know, Java EE contained two specs related to security:
- JASPIC, for authentication
- JACC, for authorization
Aside of that, every spec contained its own security related features
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#628
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Ah the proverbial light bulb has gone off in my head now. So the Security API essentially more or less is a layer on top of the disparate (?) existing security APIs in Java EE. More like
Ah the proverbial light bulb has gone off in my head now. So the Security API essentially more or less is a layer on top of the disparate (?) existing security APIs in Java EE. More like
|
By
Saeed
·
#627
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Hi,
Unfortunately this version of the spec didn't managed to implement the authorization part and basically only deals with authentication.
However the Servlet spec has since the beginning the
Hi,
Unfortunately this version of the spec didn't managed to implement the authorization part and basically only deals with authentication.
However the Servlet spec has since the beginning the
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#626
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Hi,
A specific set of JSF pages can be protected in web.xml using a security constraint.
Kind regards,
Arjan
Hi,
A specific set of JSF pages can be protected in web.xml using a security constraint.
Kind regards,
Arjan
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#625
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Hi. I've been looking at the test examples and so far I'm able to follow them. However I'm at a loss about how to declare a specific set of say JSF pages as protected.
In Shiro, I can declare in the
Hi. I've been looking at the test examples and so far I'm able to follow them. However I'm at a loss about how to declare a specific set of say JSF pages as protected.
In Shiro, I can declare in the
|
By
Saeed
·
#624
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Great to hear that! The tests are indeed the best way to get started right now.
We an to write some documentation but we're still busy finishing Soteria for its release in the next couple of
Great to hear that! The tests are indeed the best way to get started right now.
We an to write some documentation but we're still busy finishing Soteria for its release in the next couple of
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#623
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Thanks. Got it to work. Checking out the samples in the RI code repo. I think I'm getting the hang of this, coming from the Apache Shiro way of thinking. Once again thanks everyone for your
Thanks. Got it to work. Checking out the samples in the RI code repo. I think I'm getting the hang of this, coming from the Apache Shiro way of thinking. Once again thanks everyone for your
|
By
Saeed
·
#622
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Hi Saaed,
Thanks for your interest! As Will has already stated, latest promoted versions of GlassFish already integrate JSR 375, so you won't need Soteria dependency, just the API.
The latest version
Hi Saaed,
Thanks for your interest! As Will has already stated, latest promoted versions of GlassFish already integrate JSR 375, so you won't need Soteria dependency, just the API.
The latest version
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#621
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Thank you very much Will. I've no idea why the Soteria repo never came to mind.
Thanks so much. Off to play with it.
Thank you very much Will. I've no idea why the Soteria repo never came to mind.
Thanks so much. Off to play with it.
|
By
Saeed
·
#620
·
|
|
Re: Testing JSec?
Hi Saeed,
The latest GF build should have Soteria in it already.
We have not published a recent "release" version of Soteria, or the API, although there are "promoted" builds and
Hi Saeed,
The latest GF build should have Soteria in it already.
We have not published a recent "release" version of Soteria, or the API, although there are "promoted" builds and
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#619
·
|
|
Testing JSec?
Hello everyone from Accra Ghana. I would like to test out Soteria with the just published Glassfish promoted build 18. However adding the following dependency to my pom.xml results in maven throwing
Hello everyone from Accra Ghana. I would like to test out Soteria with the just published Glassfish promoted build 18. However adding the following dependency to my pom.xml results in maven throwing
|
By
Saeed
·
#618
·
|
|
Need to resolve outstanding issues with LdapIdentityStore
I've been looking at the pile of bugs currently filed against the default LdapIdentityStore in Soteria, and have noticed a couple broad themes. I'd appreciate some feedback on these ASAP, as we
I've been looking at the pile of bugs currently filed against the default LdapIdentityStore in Soteria, and have noticed a couple broad themes. I'd appreciate some feedback on these ASAP, as we
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#617
·
|