|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
I agree with Will. And in fact, we have many things to do between now and JavaOne... including finishing Java EE 8! ;-)
If one want to improve the site, that's more than welcome but may I suggest to
I agree with Will. And in fact, we have many things to do between now and JavaOne... including finishing Java EE 8! ;-)
If one want to improve the site, that's more than welcome but may I suggest to
|
By
David Delabassee
·
#616
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
It might indeed take time to process it... as the PMO is not managing OCAs ;-)
OCA should be send to oracle-ca_us(at)oracle(dot)com, see
It might indeed take time to process it... as the PMO is not managing OCAs ;-)
OCA should be send to oracle-ca_us(at)oracle(dot)com, see
|
By
David Delabassee
·
#615
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
Will,
At least JSON-B also has only a spec repository: https://github.com/javaee/jsonb-spec
Everything else is at Eclipse in its case, the API and spec document actually seem in the same repository.
Will,
At least JSON-B also has only a spec repository: https://github.com/javaee/jsonb-spec
Everything else is at Eclipse in its case, the API and spec document actually seem in the same repository.
|
By
Werner Keil
·
#614
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
Hi All,
These are all great ideas, and I'd love to see the web site improve, BUT ... the priority for the next couple of days needs to be fixing RI bugs by Tuesday (the GF RI code
Hi All,
These are all great ideas, and I'd love to see the web site improve, BUT ... the priority for the next couple of days needs to be fixing RI bugs by Tuesday (the GF RI code
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#613
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
That website is community-contributed. If needed, I can get in touch with the original author.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
That website is community-contributed. If needed, I can get in touch with the original author.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
|
By
reza_rahman <reza_rahman@...>
·
#612
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
Check out what I did for JSR 374 based on that example:
https://javaee.github.io/jsonp/
Since JSON-B and JSON-P deal with a similar domain, I changed very little, also keeping the JSON-style title or
Check out what I did for JSR 374 based on that example:
https://javaee.github.io/jsonp/
Since JSON-B and JSON-P deal with a similar domain, I changed very little, also keeping the JSON-style title or
|
By
Werner Keil
·
#611
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
Hi,
As the json-b website is (c) Oracle, I assume Java EE Security can just copy it? Check to be sure of course, but otherwise might be a nice and simple approach to copy that and replace the json-b
Hi,
As the json-b website is (c) Oracle, I assume Java EE Security can just copy it? Check to be sure of course, but otherwise might be a nice and simple approach to copy that and replace the json-b
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#610
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
JSON-B website looks definitely better than the default template, but I think we might need a designer to get that level.
I'll start writing some examples then. Btw, does anybody have the full logo?
JSON-B website looks definitely better than the default template, but I think we might need a designer to get that level.
I'll start writing some examples then. Btw, does anybody have the full logo?
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#609
·
|
|
Re: Improving the JSR 375 website
Hi,
Nice! :) I was just about to suggest the very same thing ;)
The json-b one is a nice example too: http://json-b.net
I'd definitely agree with going ahead on this.
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
Hi,
Nice! :) I was just about to suggest the very same thing ;)
The json-b one is a nice example too: http://json-b.net
I'd definitely agree with going ahead on this.
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#608
·
|
|
Improving the JSR 375 website
Hi,
I just noticed you Will already did some work on the website [1] yesterday! That's fantastic as I was about to propose doing some work on it now that the spec is basically finalized.
Basically,
Hi,
I just noticed you Will already did some work on the website [1] yesterday! That's fantastic as I was about to propose doing some work on it now that the spec is basically finalized.
Basically,
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#607
·
|
|
Re: Poll for deciding Acronym
Will,
Yes, the latest suggestion JSEC is included.
And of course, we can let it run for a week or more.
Already 7 people gave their opinion and there are 2 clear favorites ...
Best regards
Rudy
Will,
Yes, the latest suggestion JSEC is included.
And of course, we can let it run for a week or more.
Already 7 people gave their opinion and there are 2 clear favorites ...
Best regards
Rudy
|
By
Rudy De Busscher
·
#606
·
|
|
Re: Poll for deciding Acronym
Rudy, thanks very much for setting this up. Did you include the last suggestion that came in (JSEC, I think)?
FAB is actually scheduled to start next Tuesday, on August 8th, but Werner is right that
Rudy, thanks very much for setting this up. Did you include the last suggestion that came in (JSEC, I think)?
FAB is actually scheduled to start next Tuesday, on August 8th, but Werner is right that
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#605
·
|
|
Re: Poll for deciding Acronym
Thanks.
I am not sure, if there's such a hurry to find one. Since it is also holiday and some people may be on vacation, why not keep it a week or so?
The FAB has not even started yet, but an acronym
Thanks.
I am not sure, if there's such a hurry to find one. Since it is also holiday and some people may be on vacation, why not keep it a week or so?
The FAB has not even started yet, but an acronym
|
By
Werner Keil
·
#604
·
|
|
Poll for deciding Acronym
Hi all,
I have created the poll with the proposed values.
You can have a vote here: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/mvrgts7pqs4mxpf2
Since it is weekend, I propose to keep the poll running until Monday
Hi all,
I have created the poll with the proposed values.
You can have a vote here: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/mvrgts7pqs4mxpf2
Since it is weekend, I propose to keep the poll running until Monday
|
By
Rudy De Busscher
·
#603
·
|
|
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: JSR-375 Expert Group
Arjan Tijms wrote on 08/ 2/17 02:05 PM:
As Will explained, the materials submitted to the JCP aren't exactly the final versions since at least things like the license and the version
Arjan Tijms wrote on 08/ 2/17 02:05 PM:
As Will explained, the materials submitted to the JCP aren't exactly the final versions since at least things like the license and the version
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#602
·
|
|
Re: What's our Acronym?
We can add it to the list.
-- Will Hopkins | WebLogic Security Architect | +1.781.442.0310Oracle Application Development35 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
We can add it to the list.
-- Will Hopkins | WebLogic Security Architect | +1.781.442.0310Oracle Application Development35 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#601
·
|
|
Re: What's our Acronym?
What about JSec?
By
Saeed
·
#600
·
|
|
Re: What's our Acronym?
The problem with an email tally is someone has to spend an hour or two compiling the answers and analyzing the results. ;)
Werner's suggestion of a Doodle poll sounds good to me -- set to
The problem with an email tally is someone has to spend an hour or two compiling the answers and analyzing the results. ;)
Werner's suggestion of a Doodle poll sounds good to me -- set to
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#599
·
|
|
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: JSR-375 Expert Group
Werner,
Just to make sure I've captured the net result of your feedback after discussion, the one change you'd now propose is to add a referenced to JDBC 4 in Section 3.5, in relation
Werner,
Just to make sure I've captured the net result of your feedback after discussion, the one change you'd now propose is to add a referenced to JDBC 4 in Section 3.5, in relation
|
By
Will Hopkins
·
#598
·
|
|
Re: What's our Acronym?
Given that we are only a few people, I think the mailing list would suffice here.
In that case, my votes would be:
1- EE Security
2- Security API
3- JSECAPI
Regards,
Guillermo González de Agüero
Given that we are only a few people, I think the mailing list would suffice here.
In that case, my votes would be:
1- EE Security
2- Security API
3- JSECAPI
Regards,
Guillermo González de Agüero
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#597
·
|