|
Poll for deciding Acronym 4 messages
Hi all,
I have created the poll with the proposed values.
You can have a vote here: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/mvrgts7pqs4mxpf2
Since it is weekend, I propose to keep the poll running until Monday
Hi all,
I have created the poll with the proposed values.
You can have a vote here: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/mvrgts7pqs4mxpf2
Since it is weekend, I propose to keep the poll running until Monday
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
Improving the JSR 375 website 10 messages
Hi,
I just noticed you Will already did some work on the website [1] yesterday! That's fantastic as I was about to propose doing some work on it now that the spec is basically finalized.
Basically, th
Hi,
I just noticed you Will already did some work on the website [1] yesterday! That's fantastic as I was about to propose doing some work on it now that the spec is basically finalized.
Basically, th
|
By Guillermo González de Agüero
·
|
|
Testing JSec? 11 messages
Hello everyone from Accra Ghana. I would like to test out Soteria with the just published Glassfish promoted build 18. However adding the following dependency to my pom.xml results in maven throwing a
Hello everyone from Accra Ghana. I would like to test out Soteria with the just published Glassfish promoted build 18. However adding the following dependency to my pom.xml results in maven throwing a
|
By Saeed
·
|
|
Need to resolve outstanding issues with LdapIdentityStore 3 messages
I've been looking at the pile of bugs currently filed against the
default LdapIdentityStore in Soteria, and have noticed a couple
broad themes. I'd appreciate some feedback on these ASAP, as w
I've been looking at the pile of bugs currently filed against the
default LdapIdentityStore in Soteria, and have noticed a couple
broad themes. I'd appreciate some feedback on these ASAP, as w
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
JSR-375 Session at JavaOne 6 messages
All:
Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend JavaOne in October, so
can't present the session that I'd planned.
Fortunately, Ivar Grimstad will be attending, and has agreed
All:
Unfortunately, I won't be able to attend JavaOne in October, so
can't present the session that I'd planned.
Fortunately, Ivar Grimstad will be attending, and has agreed
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED: JSR-375 Expert Group 15 messages
FYI, this message was also sent directly to EG members.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:
ACTION REQUIRE
FYI, this message was also sent directly to EG members.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:
ACTION REQUIRE
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Move security-examples repo to Java EE org at GitHub? 7 messages
All:
I'd like to make the security-examples repo an "official" repo for
the JSR, and move it into the Java EE org. The GF doc/samples team
is looking for JSR-375 samples, and it mak
All:
I'd like to make the security-examples repo an "official" repo for
the JSR, and move it into the Java EE org. The GF doc/samples team
is looking for JSR-375 samples, and it mak
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Branches to prune in JSR-375 repos 3 messages
All,
It looks to me as if the following branches can be pruned from the
JSR-375 repos. Any objections? I won't do this soon, but please let
me know asap if any of them need to be pr
All,
It looks to me as if the following branches can be pruned from the
JSR-375 repos. Any objections? I won't do this soon, but please let
me know asap if any of them need to be pr
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Need comment on Issue #174 ASAP 4 messages
Arjan,
Can you have a look at #174,
and let me know what you think ASAP?
To summarize, I think the RememberMeInterceptor must call
invocationContext.proceed(), to delegat
Arjan,
Can you have a look at #174,
and let me know what you think ASAP?
To summarize, I think the RememberMeInterceptor must call
invocationContext.proceed(), to delegat
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Final Approval Ballot passes! :) 7 messages
Hi all,
Today we passed our Final Approval Ballot:
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=6044
The result is an unanimous yes, with only Intel not having voted.
Thanks to everybody involved :) Without all
Hi all,
Today we passed our Final Approval Ballot:
https://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=6044
The result is an unanimous yes, with only Intel not having voted.
Thanks to everybody involved :) Without all
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
NOTICE: Moving the security-examples repo to JavaEE tonight 14 messages
If anyone's working in the
github.com/javaee-security-spec/security-examples repo, please note
that I'll be moving it to the Java EE org (github.com/javaee)
sometime in the next 12 hours.
If anyone's working in the
github.com/javaee-security-spec/security-examples repo, please note
that I'll be moving it to the Java EE org (github.com/javaee)
sometime in the next 12 hours.
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
GDPR: It’s Time to Comply
This overlaps with JavaOne, but maybe someone in Europe or the UK who can't make it to JavaOne this year could also enjoy this Security event.
Kind Regards,
Werner
---------- Forwarded message -----
This overlaps with JavaOne, but maybe someone in Europe or the UK who can't make it to JavaOne this year could also enjoy this Security event.
Kind Regards,
Werner
---------- Forwarded message -----
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
Release 1.0 to Maven central? 2 messages
Hi,
Currently Maven central only has the b07 release. See http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/glassfish/soteria/javax.security.enterprise
It would perhaps be a good idea to release 1.0 too ;)
Kind reg
Hi,
Currently Maven central only has the b07 release. See http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/glassfish/soteria/javax.security.enterprise
It would perhaps be a good idea to release 1.0 too ;)
Kind reg
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Release 1.0 in Maven Central and its dependency tree 5 messages
Hi,
Now that the 1.0 release is posted on Maven Central, can someone just check if I am following the POMs completely wrong:
org.glassfish.security:javax.security.enterprise 1.0 contains the following
Hi,
Now that the 1.0 release is posted on Maven Central, can someone just check if I am following the POMs completely wrong:
org.glassfish.security:javax.security.enterprise 1.0 contains the following
|
By Ashley Richardson
·
|
|
JCP Award 2017 4 messages
Dear All, The JCP page has not been updated yet, but JSR 375 won the JCP Award for Most Significant JSR as announced at the JCP Party last night: https://jcp.org/en/press/news/awards/2017award_nominee
Dear All, The JCP page has not been updated yet, but JSR 375 won the JCP Award for Most Significant JSR as announced at the JCP Party last night: https://jcp.org/en/press/news/awards/2017award_nominee
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
Java EE Security.Next 10 messages
Hi, Without an EG being active and with the EE transfer in progress so that there's being little chance of starting an EG now or before long, I wonder what the best way forward is at this moment for J
Hi, Without an EG being active and with the EE transfer in progress so that there's being little chance of starting an EG now or before long, I wonder what the best way forward is at this moment for J
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Independent JSR 375 implementation 13 messages
Hi, For the ones who haven’t seen it yet; OpenLiberty started with their own implementation of JSR 375. See: https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/tree/master/dev/com.ibm.ws.security.javaeesec/s
Hi, For the ones who haven’t seen it yet; OpenLiberty started with their own implementation of JSR 375. See: https://github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/tree/master/dev/com.ibm.ws.security.javaeesec/s
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Siteminder Integration for JSR 375?
Hi, I am currently helping a large client who needs Role and Identity Management in a Microservice environment using Java EE (Payara to be more precise, which helps because it got Soteria built-in rec
Hi, I am currently helping a large client who needs Role and Identity Management in a Microservice environment using Java EE (Payara to be more precise, which helps because it got Soteria built-in rec
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
Seeding EE4J project for Security 7 messages
We're currently seeding two projects with initial committers we'd like to make sure the existing EG can get their names on the initial proposal. Of course everyone can join after, but it's always more
We're currently seeding two projects with initial committers we'd like to make sure the existing EG can get their names on the initial proposal. Of course everyone can join after, but it's always more
|
By David Blevins
·
|
|
Dependency Bug in Soteria 1.0 9 messages
All, I just found a very bad bug in Soteria 1.0 as it's out there in MavenCentral since August 2017 ;-/ I can't even set labels like "bug" but it is clearly a major bug and showstopper from using Sote
All, I just found a very bad bug in Soteria 1.0 as it's out there in MavenCentral since August 2017 ;-/ I can't even set labels like "bug" but it is clearly a major bug and showstopper from using Sote
|
By Werner Keil
·
|