|
LDAP Annotation and Database Hashing Proposal 77 messages
I've made some changes to the DatabaseIdentityStoreDefinition and
LdapIdentityStoreDefinition on a branch; I'd appreciate
review/comments by anyone with time to look at them. The changes are
I've made some changes to the DatabaseIdentityStoreDefinition and
LdapIdentityStoreDefinition on a branch; I'd appreciate
review/comments by anyone with time to look at them. The changes are
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Coding Up LdapIdentityStoreDefinition Changes 3 messages
Unless someone else is already doing this, I plan to code up the
changes to LdapIdentityStore needed to support the
LdapIdentityStoreDefinition changes in the PFD (search scope,
memberOf s
Unless someone else is already doing this, I plan to code up the
changes to LdapIdentityStore needed to support the
LdapIdentityStoreDefinition changes in the PFD (search scope,
memberOf s
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Review PasswordHash / DatabaseIdentityStore 2 messages
Copied some parts out of the other thread as it becomes too unreadable.
remove the "plumbing" that passees the properties down to the hash implementation, in case we want to restore the properties.
Copied some parts out of the other thread as it becomes too unreadable.
remove the "plumbing" that passees the properties down to the hash implementation, in case we want to restore the properties.
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
Missing description of @LoginToContinue interceptor in spec 9 messages
Hi,
I was looking for the @LoginToContinue annotation info within the spec.
I see that it is only mentioning that the 2 Form definition annotations need such a member.
But there is no description of t
Hi,
I was looking for the @LoginToContinue annotation info within the spec.
I see that it is only mentioning that the 2 Form definition annotations need such a member.
But there is no description of t
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
Expert Group meeting this week, or next? 15 messages
EG:
I'd like to meet again, either late this week (Thursday/Friday) or
early next week (Monday/Tuesday)
It seems like early afternoon EDT/early evening CET works best for
EG:
I'd like to meet again, either late this week (Thursday/Friday) or
early next week (Monday/Tuesday)
It seems like early afternoon EDT/early evening CET works best for
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
JSR-375 Expert Group Meeting
NotificationMeeting Invite
Will Hopkins has invited you to
JSR-375 Expert Group MeetingDate:Mon, Jul 24, 2017Time:2:00 PM - 4:00 PM EDTLocation:Zoom -- see below for detailsOrganizer:Will HopkinsAtten
NotificationMeeting Invite
Will Hopkins has invited you to
JSR-375 Expert Group MeetingDate:Mon, Jul 24, 2017Time:2:00 PM - 4:00 PM EDTLocation:Zoom -- see below for detailsOrganizer:Will HopkinsAtten
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Packaging bundle vs jar 7 messages
Hi,
I noticed this commit: https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria/commit/421b6f001c31cd3d64bad0b0f62807ebbb1c7712
Where the comment said "bundle" is needed for GF integration. However JSF/Moj
Hi,
I noticed this commit: https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria/commit/421b6f001c31cd3d64bad0b0f62807ebbb1c7712
Where the comment said "bundle" is needed for GF integration. However JSF/Moj
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Github Java EE organization memberschip 14 messages
Hi Will,
Can you also add me to the Java EE Organization and the "Java EE Security Team" just like all the other active EG members and contributors?
Thanks
Rudy
Hi Will,
Can you also add me to the Java EE Organization and the "Java EE Security Team" just like all the other active EG members and contributors?
Thanks
Rudy
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
REPO MIGRATION COMPLETE 4 messages
The repo migration is complete. Please take the time to read this
email completely, as it explains how access to the repos works now,
and what you'll need to know/do in order to contribute goi
The repo migration is complete. Please take the time to read this
email completely, as it explains how access to the repos works now,
and what you'll need to know/do in order to contribute goi
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
LDAP memberOf Support
So I added support for group lookup via memberOf to the PFD version
of the spec.
Any EG members know whether it's possible to configure Unbounded or
OpenDJ to support memberOf, and,
So I added support for group lookup via memberOf to the PFD version
of the spec.
Any EG members know whether it's possible to configure Unbounded or
OpenDJ to support memberOf, and,
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
WARNING! PLEASE READ! (Was: Fwd: Re: [javaee-security-spec] Moving to Java EE Github?) 14 messages
I thought I sent this out yesterday, but forgot to copy the list --
just as well that I wasn't able to complete the migration last
night, although I did get started on the security-spec repo.
I thought I sent this out yesterday, but forgot to copy the list --
just as well that I wasn't able to complete the migration last
night, although I did get started on the security-spec repo.
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Moving to Java EE Github? 14 messages
Hi,
At least before Proposed Final Draft I was wondering, if a move to the official GitHub organization for Java EE https://github.com/javaee was planned any time soon?
If it isn't done now, then most
Hi,
At least before Proposed Final Draft I was wondering, if a move to the official GitHub organization for Java EE https://github.com/javaee was planned any time soon?
If it isn't done now, then most
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
Soteria Updates for PFD Changes 2 messages
EG,
Trying to get a sense of how much work is left to get soteria
updated to match the PFD version of the spec. A good chunk is
already done, but I'd like to check on the following
EG,
Trying to get a sense of how much work is left to get soteria
updated to match the PFD version of the spec. A good chunk is
already done, but I'd like to check on the following
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Java EE Security.next and JWT (JSON Web Tokens) 13 messages
There is one EC no vote due to lack of effectively JWT support.
I see Rudy has done some work very recently:
- https://github.com/rdebusscher/soteria-jwt
Scott has mentioned it recently as well, but
There is one EC no vote due to lack of effectively JWT support.
I see Rudy has done some work very recently:
- https://github.com/rdebusscher/soteria-jwt
Scott has mentioned it recently as well, but
|
By David Blevins
·
|
|
Released javax.security.enterprise-api version 1.0-b07
Artifacts are now published in the "releases" repository at
maven.java.net.
--
Will Hopkins | WebLogic Security Architect | +1.781.442.0310
Oracle Application Development
35 Network Drive, B
Artifacts are now published in the "releases" repository at
maven.java.net.
--
Will Hopkins | WebLogic Security Architect | +1.781.442.0310
Oracle Application Development
35 Network Drive, B
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
EC Vote and Proposed Final Draft submitted to JCP 3 messages
A couple of announcements:
The Public Review Ballot passed, with 21 yes votes, 1 no vote,
and 3 who didn't vote at all. The no vote was from JetBrains; I
have reached out
A couple of announcements:
The Public Review Ballot passed, with 21 yes votes, 1 no vote,
and 3 who didn't vote at all. The no vote was from JetBrains; I
have reached out
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Feature Freeze and EE 8
Hi Werner,
Linda and I sync'd up on that and I believe the two specs are
consistent, although the EE 8 spec obviously doesn't go into as much
detail and doesn't list every API.
Hi Werner,
Linda and I sync'd up on that and I believe the two specs are
consistent, although the EE 8 spec obviously doesn't go into as much
detail and doesn't list every API.
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Please Review security-api Pull Request #38 ASAP 4 messages
I've made a number of API changes as discussed during the EG call
last week. I plan to submit the changes as part of the PFD
submission today, so if anyone has comments please let me know ASAP
I've made a number of API changes as discussed during the EG call
last week. I plan to submit the changes as part of the PFD
submission today, so if anyone has comments please let me know ASAP
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Default group to role mapping 12 messages
I've gotten some feedback on the default group -> role mapping
that I'd like to share with the EG:
The first is some concern about the impact of a default
mapping on security.
I've gotten some feedback on the default group -> role mapping
that I'd like to share with the EG:
The first is some concern about the impact of a default
mapping on security.
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Public Review Draft Comments Guillermo González de Agüero 16 messages
Hi,
Here are my thoughts about the current draft of the spec. Some of them are very subjective and some are about rewording phrases that I may have misunderstood due to my poor English.
Page 4 - Cont
Hi,
Here are my thoughts about the current draft of the spec. Some of them are very subjective and some are about rewording phrases that I may have misunderstood due to my poor English.
Page 4 - Cont
|
By Guillermo González de Agüero
·
|