|
Public Review Draft Comments - WebLogic Security Team
I'm submitting these comments on behalf of Oracle's WebLogic
security team.
Section 1.1:
Add groups to "security data" in description of Identity
Store?
Se
I'm submitting these comments on behalf of Oracle's WebLogic
security team.
Section 1.1:
Add groups to "security data" in description of Identity
Store?
Se
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Publishing Artifacts to maven.java.net 17 messages
I've updated soteria so that it can be published to maven.java.net,
and published version 1.0-b08. It's currently only in the "Promoted"
repo -- the Glassfish build will see it there -- but I
I've updated soteria so that it can be published to maven.java.net,
and published version 1.0-b08. It's currently only in the "Promoted"
repo -- the Glassfish build will see it there -- but I
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Info on Github organization page 3 messages
I see that the Github organization https://github.com/javaee-security-spec still has references to the java.net infrastructure (mailing list and spec page).
I don't know who has the proper rights to u
I see that the Github organization https://github.com/javaee-security-spec still has references to the java.net infrastructure (mailing list and spec page).
I don't know who has the proper rights to u
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
PR to fix tests with the "provided" profile
Hi,
I tried the provided profile for the tests once again and found out it didn't work anymore. The provided profile only depends on the API and assumed a (Java EE 8) server that has the Java EE Secur
Hi,
I tried the provided profile for the tests once again and found out it didn't work anymore. The provided profile only depends on the API and assumed a (Java EE 8) server that has the Java EE Secur
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Update Soteria to latest version API : pull request for review 5 messages
Hi All,
I have updated the Soteria version to 1.0-m06-SNAPSHOT.
I also used the 1.0-b06 version of the API, and thus updated the imports to reflect the new package structure within API.
The work can b
Hi All,
I have updated the Soteria version to 1.0-m06-SNAPSHOT.
I also used the 1.0-b06 version of the API, and thus updated the imports to reflect the new package structure within API.
The work can b
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
Access to TCK 7 messages
Hi,
I don't know if the TCK work for JSR 375 has already started, but since the JSR states it's closed source, I would like to request access to this TCK, so I can validate that it's sufficiently corr
Hi,
I don't know if the TCK work for JSR 375 has already started, but since the JSR states it's closed source, I would like to request access to this TCK, so I can validate that it's sufficiently corr
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Restore write access for all EG members? 17 messages
Hi,
I noticed that the PRD has been published (thanks for that!), but that write access has not been restored for the Java EE Security API and spec repos.
Would be great if that access can be restored
Hi,
I noticed that the PRD has been published (thanks for that!), but that write access has not been restored for the Java EE Security API and spec repos.
Would be great if that access can be restored
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Code Soteria repository no longerinlinewith API repository 2 messages
Hope so indeed!
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Discussion: Artifact Group Id and Package Names 16 messages
EG:
As part of getting ready to publish our artifacts to maven.java.net,
I've been looking at the following naming guidelines:
https://javaee.github.io/glassfish/wiki-archive/Maven%20Ve
EG:
As part of getting ready to publish our artifacts to maven.java.net,
I've been looking at the following naming guidelines:
https://javaee.github.io/glassfish/wiki-archive/Maven%20Ve
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Discussion: Artifact Group Id and PackageNames 5 messages
Hi,
As for the groupId, I am not sure, if Bill or others are worried about „javax.security“ being used by other Standards?
JSR 374 and 367 (the first Version of that new Standard) share „javax
Hi,
As for the groupId, I am not sure, if Bill or others are worried about „javax.security“ being used by other Standards?
JSR 374 and 367 (the first Version of that new Standard) share „javax
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
Code Soteria repository no longer inline with API repository 5 messages
Hi All,
I was trying to update some examples I have for a presentation with Soteria.
But the current code in Github https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria gives me issues.
It points to 1.0-m0
Hi All,
I was trying to update some examples I have for a presentation with Soteria.
But the current code in Github https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria gives me issues.
It points to 1.0-m0
|
By Rudy De Busscher
·
|
|
Code Soteria repository no longerinlinewith API repository
Hopefully before Final or better PFD?
As I understood correctly nobody knows. What I heard was that repos with existing GitHub presence will stay at their current location for at least the sho
Hopefully before Final or better PFD?
As I understood correctly nobody knows. What I heard was that repos with existing GitHub presence will stay at their current location for at least the sho
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
Code Soteria repository no longer inlinewith API repository
Hi,
As I understood correctly nobody knows. What I heard was that repos with existing GitHub presence will stay at their current location for at least the short term.
If that holds for all repos, and
Hi,
As I understood correctly nobody knows. What I heard was that repos with existing GitHub presence will stay at their current location for at least the short term.
If that holds for all repos, and
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
Code Soteria repository no longer inlinewith API repository
When will the repository be moved to the JavaEE space btw.?
Kind Regards,
Werner
When will the repository be moved to the JavaEE space btw.?
Kind Regards,
Werner
|
By Werner Keil
·
|
|
LoginToContinue forward support on error 3 messages
Hi,
Reviewing the LoginToContinue annotation, it has a "useForwardToLogin" to specify whether a redirect or a forward should be used when the user requests a protected resource. However, behavior of t
Hi,
Reviewing the LoginToContinue annotation, it has a "useForwardToLogin" to specify whether a redirect or a forward should be used when the user requests a protected resource. However, behavior of t
|
By Guillermo González de Agüero
·
|
|
Discussion: SecurityContext - downcasting getCallerPrincipal() 7 messages
Hi Arjan,
I removed that to trigger this discussion. I also added some new
language about principals requirements in chapter 2, which is now
called, "Concepts and General Requiremen
Hi Arjan,
I removed that to trigger this discussion. I also added some new
language about principals requirements in chapter 2, which is now
called, "Concepts and General Requiremen
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Doubts about xml files within WEB-INF 3 messages
Hello everyone !
My name is Daniel and I'm from Brazil.
I started my experiment in the new API shortly and I have a question regarding the xml's that are in the folder WEB-INF like the:
Glassfish-web.
Hello everyone !
My name is Daniel and I'm from Brazil.
I started my experiment in the new API shortly and I have a question regarding the xml's that are in the folder WEB-INF like the:
Glassfish-web.
|
By Daniel Dias
·
|
|
Public Review Draft Published
The Public Review Draft for JSR-375 has been published, and is
available from the JSR-375 site at the JCP
(https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=375).
Direct link to the download page:
The Public Review Draft for JSR-375 has been published, and is
available from the JSR-375 site at the JCP
(https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=375).
Direct link to the download page:
|
By Will Hopkins
·
|
|
Small typo in PRD 3 messages
Hi, noticed the following after a second read:
(emphasis mine)
I think what's meant here is BASIC and FORM, isn't it?
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
Hi, noticed the following after a second read:
(emphasis mine)
I think what's meant here is BASIC and FORM, isn't it?
Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|
|
hasAccessToWebResource method 7 messages
Hi,
As requested by Werner, splitting this topic off from the welcome thread.
The previous discussion was about the format of the URL pattern and whether Servlet did, or did not define it.
As ment
Hi,
As requested by Werner, splitting this topic off from the welcome thread.
The previous discussion was about the format of the URL pattern and whether Servlet did, or did not define it.
As ment
|
By Arjan Tijms
·
|