Re: RMI-IIOP proposed optional

Jens Engel
 

Hi Bill,

thanks for your answer.

I know that there are new ways for building applications but - well - there are existing applications which cannot easily be transformed into this direction - and I reckon that there are domains where classical data consistency requirements still apply.

Where do I have to "file this issue" (clarification that declaring RMI-IIOP as optional does not mean dropping requirements for transactional remoting) officially, so it will be considered in the work for future Java EE specs?

Best regards

-Jens

Join javaee-spec@javaee.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.