Re: RMI-IIOP proposed optional

Jens Engel

Hi Bill,

thanks for your answer.

I know that there are new ways for building applications but - well - there are existing applications which cannot easily be transformed into this direction - and I reckon that there are domains where classical data consistency requirements still apply.

Where do I have to "file this issue" (clarification that declaring RMI-IIOP as optional does not mean dropping requirements for transactional remoting) officially, so it will be considered in the work for future Java EE specs?

Best regards


Join to automatically receive all group messages.