Re: RMI-IIOP proposed optional
Bill Shannon
Jens Engel wrote on 08/ 4/17 02:34 AM:
Hi Bill,Right, which is why I expect many Java EE vendors will be supporting these technologies for quite some time, even after they become optional. Where do I have to "file this issue" (clarification that declaring RMI-IIOP as optional does not mean dropping requirements for transactional remoting) officially, so it will be considered in the work for future Java EE specs?Java EE issue tracker EJB issue tracker
|
|