|
Re: Java EE 8 dependency JTA issue on modulepath
GlassFish 5.0.1 will use JTA 1.3. The current development release includes this change.
We're not planning to publish new versions of the API jar files since this doesn't change the
GlassFish 5.0.1 will use JTA 1.3. The current development release includes this change.
We're not planning to publish new versions of the API jar files since this doesn't change the
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#89
·
|
|
Re: Question on transaction propagation in EJB remoting
Yes, sorry, Kevin is right.
Transaction propagation is only required within a single product instance, which (depending on the architecture of the product) might involve multiple
Yes, sorry, Kevin is right.
Transaction propagation is only required within a single product instance, which (depending on the architecture of the product) might involve multiple
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#88
·
|
|
Re: Question on transaction propagation in EJB remoting
Hi Klaus,
I can’t comment about this issue, but full 100% absolutely compatibility with the Java EE specs is rare. The CTS/TCK supposedly contains a LOT of tests, but there’s always things
Hi Klaus,
I can’t comment about this issue, but full 100% absolutely compatibility with the Java EE specs is rare. The CTS/TCK supposedly contains a LOT of tests, but there’s always things
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#87
·
|
|
Re: Question on transaction propagation in EJB remoting
Hi Klaus,
In section E.4.2.1.1 Transaction Requirements, there is the following statement. Liberty fully supports this "local" transaction propagation.
Note that this transaction propagation
Hi Klaus,
In section E.4.2.1.1 Transaction Requirements, there is the following statement. Liberty fully supports this "local" transaction propagation.
Note that this transaction propagation
|
By
Kevin Sutter
·
#86
·
Edited
|
|
Java EE 8 dependency JTA issue on modulepath
Hi,
Doing some testing with Java modules, I found the Java EE 8 API has a splitted package problem on JTA. This was fixed on a JTA MR but it was done after Java EE 8 went final [1].
This is only a
Hi,
Doing some testing with Java modules, I found the Java EE 8 API has a splitted package problem on JTA. This was fixed on a JTA MR but it was done after Java EE 8 went final [1].
This is only a
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#85
·
|
|
Re: Question on transaction propagation in EJB remoting
Thanks for the clarification Bill.
How can IBM Liberty be listed as a Java EE 7 and 8 Full Platform Compatible Implementation if it does not support transaction propagation in EJB remoting at all?
Is
Thanks for the clarification Bill.
How can IBM Liberty be listed as a Java EE 7 and 8 Full Platform Compatible Implementation if it does not support transaction propagation in EJB remoting at all?
Is
|
By
klaus.rothert@...
·
#84
·
|
|
Re: Question on transaction propagation in EJB remoting
Yes, transaction propagation is required, but interoperability of transaction propagation between vendors is unspecified.
klaus.rothert@... wrote on 08/10/2018 05:30 AM:
Yes, transaction propagation is required, but interoperability of transaction propagation between vendors is unspecified.
klaus.rothert@... wrote on 08/10/2018 05:30 AM:
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#83
·
|
|
Question on transaction propagation in EJB remoting
Hello,
we recently looked into IBM Liberty as Java EE container and were very suprised to find that it does not support inbound or outbound transaction propagation. Asking our IBM contact about that
Hello,
we recently looked into IBM Liberty as Java EE container and were very suprised to find that it does not support inbound or outbound transaction propagation. Asking our IBM contact about that
|
By
klaus.rothert@...
·
#82
·
|
|
Re: Javadoc for Java EE 8?
They're also linked from the Java EE Documentation page.
Kevin Sutter wrote on 11/28/17 09:02 AM:
They're also linked from the Java EE Documentation page.
Kevin Sutter wrote on 11/28/17 09:02 AM:
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#81
·
|
|
Re: Javadoc for Java EE 8?
FWIW, https://javaee.github.io is an easy to remember URL for 'key' Java EE resources.
--David
FWIW, https://javaee.github.io is an easy to remember URL for 'key' Java EE resources.
--David
|
By
David Delabassee
·
#80
·
|
|
Re: Javadoc for Java EE 8?
We have discussed this issue offline with Oracle if I remember correctly. The suggestion was to redirect the old URLs that Google, etc pick up to the new location. I believe the outcome was that this
We have discussed this issue offline with Oracle if I remember correctly. The suggestion was to redirect the old URLs that Google, etc pick up to the new location. I believe the outcome was that this
|
By
reza_rahman <reza_rahman@...>
·
#79
·
|
|
Re: Javadoc for Java EE 8?
Thanks, Ivar... Even Google couldn't find this for me...
Thanks, Ivar... Even Google couldn't find this for me...
|
By
Kevin Sutter
·
#78
·
|
|
Re: Javadoc for Java EE 8?
You can find it at https://javaee.github.io/javaee-spec/javadocs/
You can find it at https://javaee.github.io/javaee-spec/javadocs/
|
By
Jody Grassel
·
#77
·
|
|
Re: Javadoc for Java EE 8?
It's here: https://javaee.github.io/javaee-spec/javadocs/
Ivar
--
Java Champion, JCP EC/EG Member, EE4J PMC, JUG Leader
It's here: https://javaee.github.io/javaee-spec/javadocs/
Ivar
--
Java Champion, JCP EC/EG Member, EE4J PMC, JUG Leader
|
By
Ivar Grimstad
·
#76
·
|
|
Javadoc for Java EE 8?
In the past, the javadoc for Java EE was housed on docs.oracle.com like this for Java EE 7:
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/
But, I can't find a corresponding site for Java EE 8.
Thanks, Kevin
In the past, the javadoc for Java EE was housed on docs.oracle.com like this for Java EE 7:
https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/
But, I can't find a corresponding site for Java EE 8.
Thanks, Kevin
|
By
Kevin Sutter
·
#75
·
|
|
Re: Platform wide guideline for build-in annotation literals?
Arjan Tijms wrote on 09/19/17 01:29 PM:
Some of the annotations have literals and some do not. There may be some rationale for why only some of the annotations need literals, but it
Arjan Tijms wrote on 09/19/17 01:29 PM:
Some of the annotations have literals and some do not. There may be some rationale for why only some of the annotations need literals, but it
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#74
·
|
|
Re: Platform wide guideline for build-in annotation literals?
I'm not sure if there's any inconsistency, other than creating literals for the JSR 330 spec and including them in 299. Or is that what you're referring to?
They're mostly used for the various
I'm not sure if there's any inconsistency, other than creating literals for the JSR 330 spec and including them in 299. Or is that what you're referring to?
They're mostly used for the various
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#73
·
|
|
Re: Platform wide guideline for build-in annotation literals?
The CDI expert group didn't raise this at the platform level, and they didn't even do this consistently for their annotations, so I'm not clear on what their intent is with these
The CDI expert group didn't raise this at the platform level, and they didn't even do this consistently for their annotations, so I'm not clear on what their intent is with these
|
By
Bill Shannon
·
#72
·
|
|
Re: Platform wide guideline for build-in annotation literals?
Sorry, that's not what I meant ;)
What I meant was that each annotation should of course stay within their respective spec. I.e. @Transactional should of course stay in JTA.
But the annotation literal
Sorry, that's not what I meant ;)
What I meant was that each annotation should of course stay within their respective spec. I.e. @Transactional should of course stay in JTA.
But the annotation literal
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#71
·
|
|
Re: Platform wide guideline for build-in annotation literals?
I'd say if there is an umbrella spec with these kinds of annotations then then it must be a requirement for the other specs to implement them. Otherwise, leave the annotations within the individual
I'd say if there is an umbrella spec with these kinds of annotations then then it must be a requirement for the other specs to implement them. Otherwise, leave the annotations within the individual
|
By
Michael Remijan
·
#70
·
|