Hi Klaus, I can’t comment about this issue, but full 100% absolutely compatibility with the Java EE specs is rare. The CTS/TCK supposedly contains a LOT of tests, but there’s always things slipping th

I'm not sure if there's any inconsistency, other than creating literals for the JSR 330 spec and including them in 299. Or is that what you're referring to? They're mostly used for the various builder

Sorry, that's not what I meant ;) What I meant was that each annotation should of course stay within their respective spec. I.e. @Transactional should of course stay in JTA. But the annotation literal

Hi, CDI 2.0 introduced a number of very convenient build-in annotation literals, for many of the annotations it owns and for some it doesn't own (JSR 330). See: http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/2.0/cdi-

I think one of the issues, and for me this is huge issue, is how the JCP process is set up. In order to make changes in specs, even if they are platform initiated, specs have to be active. But specs c

Hi Kevin, I know nothing about support for the Application Client Container and Java EE Security. To be honest, I don't know much about the ACC at all, but doesn't it work via a kind of automatic remo

Hi Linda, Just a friendly ping since it has been almost a week. Would really like to hear your thoughts on the above. Thanks! Kind regards, Arjan Tijms

Hi, Thanks for the update Linda. I wonder if there aren't any direct plans to file an update for some Java EE constituent JSRs soon whether some of them might be eligible for a transfer to interested

Hi, During last JavaOne I somewhat got the impression (but may have interpreted it wrongly), that the work for Java EE 9 would more or less start in parallel with finalising Java EE 8. Since Java EE 8