|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Will you keep us updated on IBM's implementation progress? :-)
-Markus
Will you keep us updated on IBM's implementation progress? :-)
-Markus
|
By
Markus KARG
·
#244
·
|
|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Hi Pavel
Nice work - thanks for taking over from Marek and being as great as Marek was :-), being friendly, responsive and patient
Hi Santiago - thanks for your continuing leadership of this
Hi Pavel
Nice work - thanks for taking over from Marek and being as great as Marek was :-), being friendly, responsive and patient
Hi Santiago - thanks for your continuing leadership of this
|
By
Sergey Beryozkin
·
#243
·
|
|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Great job, guys!
Ah! Following Arjan, +1 for further or even totally integrate with CDI in the next release.
Great job, guys!
Ah! Following Arjan, +1 for further or even totally integrate with CDI in the next release.
|
By
Cassio Mazzochi Molin
·
#242
·
|
|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Congratulations All!
It has been a pleasure working with you all on this, and I am looking forward to working with you again in the open source.
Now it is time to implement this spec! :-)
Congratulations All!
It has been a pleasure working with you all on this, and I am looking forward to working with you again in the open source.
Now it is time to implement this spec! :-)
|
By
Andy McCright
·
#241
·
|
|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Good question indeed. I'd say that even without a JSR we can already discuss our wishlists, can't we?
My nr 1 item; further or even totally integrate with CDI ;)
Kind regards,
Arjan
Good question indeed. I'd say that even without a JSR we can already discuss our wishlists, can't we?
My nr 1 item; further or even totally integrate with CDI ;)
Kind regards,
Arjan
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#240
·
|
|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Congratulations! When do we start with JAX-RS 2.2? ;-)
Congratulations! When do we start with JAX-RS 2.2? ;-)
|
By
Markus KARG
·
#239
·
|
|
Re: JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Congratulations and thanks Pavel, Santiago and everyone involved on this release!
Now that the spec is complete, any plans to move the JAX-RS repositories under the Java EE
Congratulations and thanks Pavel, Santiago and everyone involved on this release!
Now that the spec is complete, any plans to move the JAX-RS repositories under the Java EE
|
By
Guillermo González de Agüero
·
#238
·
|
|
JAX-RS 2.1 released!
Dear experts,
it's our pleasure to announce that JAX-RS 2.1 was officially released, see https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=370.
Thanks everyone for participating!
Feel free to share this message
Dear experts,
it's our pleasure to announce that JAX-RS 2.1 was officially released, see https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=370.
Thanks everyone for participating!
Feel free to share this message
|
By
Pavel Bucek
·
#237
·
|
|
Re: Question on CompletionStage
Hi Pavel
You are right technically having MBW<Observable> is a possibility but practically speaking I can't see anyone doing it, though this is how I started from myself, but it might
Hi Pavel
You are right technically having MBW<Observable> is a possibility but practically speaking I can't see anyone doing it, though this is how I started from myself, but it might
|
By
Sergey Beryozkin
·
#236
·
|
|
Re: Question on CompletionStage
I think it make sense to file this as an issue for JAX-RS 2.2 / 3.0, so a future specification will align CXF and Jersey and give application developers safety how things shall work.
I think it make sense to file this as an issue for JAX-RS 2.2 / 3.0, so a future specification will align CXF and Jersey and give application developers safety how things shall work.
|
By
Markus KARG
·
#235
·
|
|
Re: Question on CompletionStage
Hi Sergey,
I guess that's fine, unless someone registers MessageBodyWriter for Observable, which might then now work properly.
I'm not saying that because I think that it shouldn't
Hi Sergey,
I guess that's fine, unless someone registers MessageBodyWriter for Observable, which might then now work properly.
I'm not saying that because I think that it shouldn't
|
By
Pavel Bucek
·
#234
·
|
|
Re: Question on CompletionStage
Hi Pavel
FYI, in CXF returning Observable will be handled similarly to returning CompletionStage
Cheers, Sergey
Hi Pavel
FYI, in CXF returning Observable will be handled similarly to returning CompletionStage
Cheers, Sergey
|
By
Sergey Beryozkin
·
#233
·
|
|
Re: Question on CompletionStage
Hi Markus,
confirming what you wrote would be extending of what is pretty explicitly written in the spec, so I can't do that.
Currently, the behavior is "defined" by what AsyncResponse
Hi Markus,
confirming what you wrote would be extending of what is pretty explicitly written in the spec, so I can't do that.
Currently, the behavior is "defined" by what AsyncResponse
|
By
Pavel Bucek
·
#232
·
|
|
Question on CompletionStage
Pavel,
as the spec does not explicitly mention it, can you please confirm that what the spec actually wants to say is that CompletionStage does not only imply async when declared as a method's
Pavel,
as the spec does not explicitly mention it, can you please confirm that what the spec actually wants to say is that CompletionStage does not only imply async when declared as a method's
|
By
Markus KARG
·
#231
·
|
|
Re: Final API Publication
Hi Pavel
Thanks, it is in Central now
Sergey
Hi Pavel
Thanks, it is in Central now
Sergey
|
By
Sergey Beryozkin
·
#229
·
|
|
Re: Final API Publication
I'm sorry for the delay.
I believe I'll be able release the API to be published to maven central today. (If you need it now, feel free to
I'm sorry for the delay.
I believe I'll be able release the API to be published to maven central today. (If you need it now, feel free to
|
By
Pavel Bucek
·
#228
·
|
|
Re: Final API Publication
Hi Sergey,
it will be .. soon. I'm aiming for today / this weekend.
Regards,
Pavel
Hi Sergey,
it will be .. soon. I'm aiming for today / this weekend.
Regards,
Pavel
|
By
Pavel Bucek
·
#227
·
|
|
Final API Publication
Hi Pavel
When will the final API be published to Maven Central ?
31 July was the finish of the Final Approval Ballot
Thanks, Sergey
Hi Pavel
When will the final API be published to Maven Central ?
31 July was the finish of the Final Approval Ballot
Thanks, Sergey
|
By
Sergey Beryozkin
·
#226
·
|
|
Status of JAX-RS 2.1 Implementations
Last thursday I gave a talk on JAX-RS 2.1 at JFS2017 conference using Jersey 2.26. One question was what the status of the JAX-RS implementations is _besides_ Jersey. Hence I would like to kindly ask
Last thursday I gave a talk on JAX-RS 2.1 at JFS2017 conference using Jersey 2.26. One question was what the status of the JAX-RS implementations is _besides_ Jersey. Hence I would like to kindly ask
|
By
Markus KARG
·
#225
·
|
|
Re: Proposed Final Draft
I thought I'd check the docs first before asking, and obviously I missed this one:
I thought I'd check the docs first before asking, and obviously I missed this one:
|
By
Sergey Beryozkin
·
#224
·
|