|
terminology 2 messages
aren't the names MessageBodyReader and MessageBodyWriter confusing enough to let developers think that with MessageBodyReader they can READ both request messages and response messages!!! I would sugge
aren't the names MessageBodyReader and MessageBodyWriter confusing enough to let developers think that with MessageBodyReader they can READ both request messages and response messages!!! I would sugge
|
By rawand takna
·
|
|
EE4J JAX-RS Project and Mailing List
Hi All, As many of you know, the Java EE community is moving over to the Eclipse Foundation, under the EE4J project. If you are subscribed to this list and want to remain active (or even as a passive
Hi All, As many of you know, the Java EE community is moving over to the Eclipse Foundation, under the EE4J project. If you are subscribed to this list and want to remain active (or even as a passive
|
By Andy McCright
·
|
|
Clarification regarding ManagedExecutorService in Rx Client 12 messages
Hi Experts, While working on the JAX-RS 2.1 implementation in Liberty, a colleague of mine discovered some inconsistent behavior related to the reactive client's CompletionStage with regard to executo
Hi Experts, While working on the JAX-RS 2.1 implementation in Liberty, a colleague of mine discovered some inconsistent behavior related to the reactive client's CompletionStage with regard to executo
|
By Andy McCright
·
|
|
Other JAX-RS 2.1 implementations? 4 messages
Hi All,
Given that JAX-RS 2.1 is now final, I was wondering what are the plans for the other implementaions when it comes to support JAX-RS 2.1?
In other words, are there already 2.1 implementai
Hi All,
Given that JAX-RS 2.1 is now final, I was wondering what are the plans for the other implementaions when it comes to support JAX-RS 2.1?
In other words, are there already 2.1 implementai
|
By David Delabassee
·
|
|
JAX-RS 2.1 released! 13 messages
Dear experts,
it's our pleasure to announce that JAX-RS 2.1 was officially released,
see https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=370.
Thanks everyone for participating!
Feel free to share this
Dear experts,
it's our pleasure to announce that JAX-RS 2.1 was officially released,
see https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=370.
Thanks everyone for participating!
Feel free to share this
|
By Pavel Bucek
·
|
|
Clarification of Configuration.getClasses() behavior 16 messages
Hey all,
I've quick question. The javadocs of Configuration.getClasses() state:
Get the immutable set of registered JAX-RS component (such as provider or feature) classes to be instantiated, injected
Hey all,
I've quick question. The javadocs of Configuration.getClasses() state:
Get the immutable set of registered JAX-RS component (such as provider or feature) classes to be instantiated, injected
|
By Christian Kaltepoth
·
|
|
Question on CompletionStage 6 messages
Pavel,
as the spec does not explicitly mention it, can you please confirm that what the spec actually wants to say is that CompletionStage does not only imply async when declared as a method's ret
Pavel,
as the spec does not explicitly mention it, can you please confirm that what the spec actually wants to say is that CompletionStage does not only imply async when declared as a method's ret
|
By Markus KARG
·
|
|
Final API Publication 4 messages
Hi Pavel
When will the final API be published to Maven Central ?
31 July was the finish of the Final Approval Ballot
Thanks, Sergey
Hi Pavel
When will the final API be published to Maven Central ?
31 July was the finish of the Final Approval Ballot
Thanks, Sergey
|
By Sergey Beryozkin
·
|
|
Status of JAX-RS 2.1 Implementations
Last thursday I gave a talk on JAX-RS 2.1 at JFS2017 conference using Jersey 2.26. One question was what the status of the JAX-RS implementations is _besides_ Jersey. Hence I would like to kindly ask
Last thursday I gave a talk on JAX-RS 2.1 at JFS2017 conference using Jersey 2.26. One question was what the status of the JAX-RS implementations is _besides_ Jersey. Hence I would like to kindly ask
|
By Markus KARG
·
|
|
Proposed Final Draft 11 messages
Dear experts,
we'd like to announce that Proposed Final Draft was published on JCP JSR
370 page [1].
I'd like to encourage you all to review provided artifacts and let us
know if you have any feed
Dear experts,
we'd like to announce that Proposed Final Draft was published on JCP JSR
370 page [1].
I'd like to encourage you all to review provided artifacts and let us
know if you have any feed
|
By Pavel Bucek
·
|
|
Proposed Final Draft -- Java 8 Implementation 10 messages
A target of JAX-RS 2.1 is support for Java 8. So I wonder why still idioms of the pre-8 age are used in the API implementation instead of Java 8 idioms. For example:
default OutboundSseEvent newEvent
A target of JAX-RS 2.1 is support for Java 8. So I wonder why still idioms of the pre-8 age are used in the API implementation instead of Java 8 idioms. For example:
default OutboundSseEvent newEvent
|
By Markus KARG
·
|
|
FW: [jersey/jersey] SseEventSink invokes custom WriterInterceptor with wrong type, then throws NPE (#3592) 4 messages
Experts,
I know this is really late to discuss, but in fact, I doubt that it was a good decision to take WriterInterceptor out of the processing chain for SSE events.
In fact, today I set up a
Experts,
I know this is really late to discuss, but in fact, I doubt that it was a good decision to take WriterInterceptor out of the processing chain for SSE events.
In fact, today I set up a
|
By Markus KARG
·
|
|
JAX-RS and @ValidateOnExecution 13 messages
Hey everyone,
I've a question regarding JAX-RS and @ValidateOnExecution. Please have a look at the following code:
@GET
@Path("/foobar")
@ValidateOnExecution(type = ExecutableType.NONE)
public
Hey everyone,
I've a question regarding JAX-RS and @ValidateOnExecution. Please have a look at the following code:
@GET
@Path("/foobar")
@ValidateOnExecution(type = ExecutableType.NONE)
public
|
By Christian Kaltepoth
·
|
|
Status of JAXB in JAX-RS 2.1 13 messages
Dear Spec Leads,
the JSR 370 charter says that with JAX-RS 2.1 the JAXB technology should become conditional.
Looking at the last spec draft I cannot find anything about that. Quite contrary i
Dear Spec Leads,
the JSR 370 charter says that with JAX-RS 2.1 the JAXB technology should become conditional.
Looking at the last spec draft I cannot find anything about that. Quite contrary i
|
By Markus KARG
·
|
|
doc property for all JAX-RS annotations 3 messages
Hi
I created an issue awhile back to get something like
@Path(value="/", doc="the path")
supported for all of the JAX-RS annotations.
The idea is to come up with a single well known property that
Hi
I created an issue awhile back to get something like
@Path(value="/", doc="the path")
supported for all of the JAX-RS annotations.
The idea is to come up with a single well known property that
|
By Sergey Beryozkin
·
|
|
Subresource locator - return instance or class 5 messages
Dear experts,
we are in a stage when we are re-reading spec document and
javadoc (you're welcomed to help us - if you have some favorite
typo anywhere in JAX-RS and you wan't to get
Dear experts,
we are in a stage when we are re-reading spec document and
javadoc (you're welcomed to help us - if you have some favorite
typo anywhere in JAX-RS and you wan't to get
|
By Pavel Bucek
·
|
|
CDI integration - decision 9 messages
Dear experts,
Thank you for a productive discussion about CDI integration. We now have
a good understanding of what can be achieved when using the new CDI 2.0
API.
Our recent analysis has conclude
Dear experts,
Thank you for a productive discussion about CDI integration. We now have
a good understanding of what can be achieved when using the new CDI 2.0
API.
Our recent analysis has conclude
|
By Pavel Bucek
·
|
|
module-info or not module-info.. 9 messages
Dear experts,
we originally intended to include compiled module-info to JAX-RS API
jar. Original plan was to prepare a release on final or "almost" final
Java SE 9 compliant JDK.
As you might know
Dear experts,
we originally intended to include compiled module-info to JAX-RS API
jar. Original plan was to prepare a release on final or "almost" final
Java SE 9 compliant JDK.
As you might know
|
By Pavel Bucek
·
|
|
CDI integration 46 messages
Hi,
Time is quickly running out, and I guess what the plans are regarding CDI alignment. There's an open issue [1] labeled as "2.1-candidate" but it seems no work has been done on that yet.
Given the
Hi,
Time is quickly running out, and I guess what the plans are regarding CDI alignment. There's an open issue [1] labeled as "2.1-candidate" but it seems no work has been done on that yet.
Given the
|
By Guillermo González de Agüero
·
|
|
Status update 10 messages
Dear experts,
as you might have noticed, we dealt with several small issues in the
past couple of weeks. Notable ones:
- @Priority for providers
- JSON-B integration update
- Introduction of JSON-P
Dear experts,
as you might have noticed, we dealt with several small issues in the
past couple of weeks. Notable ones:
- @Priority for providers
- JSON-B integration update
- Introduction of JSON-P
|
By Pavel Bucek
·
|