|
Maven Central download statistics for Mojarra
Dear friends of JSF,
Does anyone have the ability to get download statistics from Maven Central for Mojarra? I'm interested in seeing the download trends over the past year.
My best guess is that
Dear friends of JSF,
Does anyone have the ability to get download statistics from Maven Central for Mojarra? I'm interested in seeing the download trends over the past year.
My best guess is that
|
By
Neil Griffin
·
#46
·
|
|
Re: JSF 2.3 Table 5-3 JSF artifacts eligible for injection - Constructor Injection question
Hello Paul,
I secured some time to think about this today. If you like, you can
skip right to the CONCLUSION by searching for CONCLUSION:.
First, the general rationale for ctor injection is
Hello Paul,
I secured some time to think about this today. If you like, you can
skip right to the CONCLUSION by searching for CONCLUSION:.
First, the general rationale for ctor injection is
|
By
Ed Burns
·
#45
·
|
|
Re: JSF 2.3 Table 5-3 JSF artifacts eligible for injection - Constructor Injection question
The Platform spec issue is here: https://github.com/javaee/javaee-spec/issues/62
The Platform spec issue is here: https://github.com/javaee/javaee-spec/issues/62
|
By
pnicoluc@...
·
#44
·
|
|
Re: JSF 2.3 Table 5-3 JSF artifacts eligible for injection - Constructor Injection question
I have the following JSF 2.3 Spec issue opened: https://github.com/javaee/javaserverfaces-spec/issues/1455
I'm working to open an issue with the EE8 platform spec. I'll post that in this thread once
I have the following JSF 2.3 Spec issue opened: https://github.com/javaee/javaserverfaces-spec/issues/1455
I'm working to open an issue with the EE8 platform spec. I'll post that in this thread once
|
By
pnicoluc@...
·
#43
·
|
|
Re: JSF 2.3 Table 5-3 JSF artifacts eligible for injection - Constructor Injection question
I reached out to Ed Burns directly and got the following response:
Hello Paul,
Thanks for following the correct protocol for reaching out to us as
stewards of JSF. I'm very sorry that I was unable to
I reached out to Ed Burns directly and got the following response:
Hello Paul,
Thanks for following the correct protocol for reaching out to us as
stewards of JSF. I'm very sorry that I was unable to
|
By
pnicoluc@...
·
#42
·
|
|
Re: jsfcentral.com
It's definitely time. The site could use a facelift. I know a lot of people that rely on the site as a JSF resource still.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
It's definitely time. The site could use a facelift. I know a lot of people that rely on the site as a JSF resource still.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
|
By
reza_rahman <reza_rahman@...>
·
#41
·
|
|
jsfcentral.com
So, I'll table the talks about javaserverfaces.com for now and turn the attention to jsfcentral.com. I've been meaning to move it to a new platform for years, and now it's time. Right now I'm thinking
So, I'll table the talks about javaserverfaces.com for now and turn the attention to jsfcentral.com. I've been meaning to move it to a new platform for years, and now it's time. Right now I'm thinking
|
By
Kito Mann
·
#40
·
|
|
Re: JSF 2.3 Section 5.4.1 question regarding injection
PN> Hello, According to the JSF spec section 5.4.1 JSF Managed Classes
PN> and Java EE Annotations, there are a bunch of JSF artifacts eligible
PN> for injection.
EB> First, let me introduce you to
PN> Hello, According to the JSF spec section 5.4.1 JSF Managed Classes
PN> and Java EE Annotations, there are a bunch of JSF artifacts eligible
PN> for injection.
EB> First, let me introduce you to
|
By
Edward Burns
·
#39
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
KM> Is there a particular reason you think Oracle would act differently
KM> regarding javaserverfaces.com than they have since Dan Allen and co put up
KM> the site many, many years ago?
I am not
KM> Is there a particular reason you think Oracle would act differently
KM> regarding javaserverfaces.com than they have since Dan Allen and co put up
KM> the site many, many years ago?
I am not
|
By
Edward Burns
·
#38
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
Ed,
Is there a particular reason you think Oracle would act differently regarding javaserverfaces.com than they have since Dan Allen and co put up the site many, many years ago?
___
Kito D. Mann |
Ed,
Is there a particular reason you think Oracle would act differently regarding javaserverfaces.com than they have since Dan Allen and co put up the site many, many years ago?
___
Kito D. Mann |
|
By
Kito Mann
·
#37
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
Java is an island, isn't is? ;-)
Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de
it-rezension.de
Java is an island, isn't is? ;-)
Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
Michael Müller
Brühl, Germany
blog.mueller-bruehl.de
it-rezension.de
|
By
Michael Müller
·
#36
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
Hey Ed,
I think it's fair to point out that javaserverfaces.com/org has been up and running for several years without any complaints with Oracle, and that was before all of the Java EE drama of the
Hey Ed,
I think it's fair to point out that javaserverfaces.com/org has been up and running for several years without any complaints with Oracle, and that was before all of the Java EE drama of the
|
By
Kito Mann
·
#35
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
Hi,
As for the domain name, I have to agree with Ed and be careful about using anything with the name “java” in it.
Once tEE4J (or whatever name the actual project will get) is fullly established,
Hi,
As for the domain name, I have to agree with Ed and be careful about using anything with the name “java” in it.
Once tEE4J (or whatever name the actual project will get) is fullly established,
|
By
Arjan Tijms
·
#34
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
Hello Kito,
Thanks for reactivating that site. I hate to be the spoilsport here, but based on empirical observations, names that start with "java" tend to be at risk for Oracle asserting their right
Hello Kito,
Thanks for reactivating that site. I hate to be the spoilsport here, but based on empirical observations, names that start with "java" tend to be at risk for Oracle asserting their right
|
By
Ed Burns
·
#33
·
|
|
New javaserverfaces.com
Hello,
As many of you know, javaserverfaces.com has been out of date for quite some time. I had a contractor of mine create a new version of the site using Jekyll and github so we could have something
Hello,
As many of you know, javaserverfaces.com has been out of date for quite some time. I had a contractor of mine create a new version of the site using Jekyll and github so we could have something
|
By
Kito Mann
·
#32
·
|
|
Re: New javaserverfaces.com
Hi Kito,
Thanks indeed for doing this. It is very important to have a modern look and updated content.
But the number of sites and URLs are just too much, too much:
* The site you are updating
Hi Kito,
Thanks indeed for doing this. It is very important to have a modern look and updated content.
But the number of sites and URLs are just too much, too much:
* The site you are updating
|
By
Neil Griffin
·
#31
·
|
|
Mojarra Pull Requests now and at EE4J
Hello JSF Community,
I have been delighted to see all the pull requests coming in over
GitHub. Thank you very much for contributing them.
Pull Requests or comments have been submitted by some of
Hello JSF Community,
I have been delighted to see all the pull requests coming in over
GitHub. Thank you very much for contributing them.
Pull Requests or comments have been submitted by some of
|
By
Edward Burns
·
#30
·
|
|
Re: JSF 2.3 Table 5-3 JSF artifacts eligible for injection - Constructor Injection question
Anyone have any thoughts on this one?
Thanks!
Anyone have any thoughts on this one?
Thanks!
|
By
pnicoluc@...
·
#29
·
|
|
Re: https://javaserverfaces.github.io/download.html
Just did some changes: https://github.com/javaserverfaces/javaserverfaces.github.io/pull/2
users@... and dev@... are both replaced by https://javaee.groups.io/g/mojarra/ right?
The "Contribute - How
Just did some changes: https://github.com/javaserverfaces/javaserverfaces.github.io/pull/2
users@... and dev@... are both replaced by https://javaee.groups.io/g/mojarra/ right?
The "Contribute - How
|
By
Dennis Kieselhorst
·
#28
·
|
|
Re: https://javaserverfaces.github.io/download.html
AT> The JSF homepage is quite out of date, mentioning EE 7 is probably one of the least outdated parts :(
AT> I've had it on my TODO to at least somewhat update it for well over 4 months now, but
AT> The JSF homepage is quite out of date, mentioning EE 7 is probably one of the least outdated parts :(
AT> I've had it on my TODO to at least somewhat update it for well over 4 months now, but
|
By
Edward Burns
·
#27
·
|