Date
1 - 8 of 8
New javaserverfaces.com
KM> Is there a particular reason you think Oracle would act differentlyOn Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:19:08 -0500, "Kito Mann" <kito.mann@...> said: KM> regarding javaserverfaces.com than they have since Dan Allen and co put up KM> the site many, many years ago? I am not party to that side of the business but I can say that it seems reasonable that part of the business would be paying more attention to this sort of thing now, given the desire to do the Java EE to EE4J transition correctly for all stakeholders. Thanks, Ed -- | 10 business days until CodeEurope Poland 2017 | 56 business days until JavaLand 2018 | edward.burns@... | office: +1 407 458 0017 |
|
|
|
Ed, Is there a particular reason you think Oracle would act differently regarding javaserverfaces.com than they have since Dan Allen and co put up the site many, many years ago? ___ Kito D. Mann | @kito99 Expert training and consulting: PrimeFaces, PrimeNG, JSF, Java EE, Polymer, Web Components, Angular JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ed Burns <edburns@...> wrote: Hello Kito, |
|
|
|
Michael Müller
Java is an island, isn't is? ;-) Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards, Michael Müller Brühl, Germany blog.mueller-bruehl.de it-rezension.de @muellermi Read my books "Web Development with Java and JSF" (available for short time only): https://leanpub.com/jsf "Practical JSF in Java EE 8" (from 2018): http://www.apress.com/us/book/9781484230299 "Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams": http://www.apress.com/de/book/9781484224861 "Visitors" a photographic image book: https://leanpub.com/visitors On 02.11.2017 17:26, Arjan Tijms wrote:
Hi, |
|
|
|
Hey Ed, I think it's fair to point out that javaserverfaces.com/org has been up and running for several years without any complaints with Oracle, and that was before all of the Java EE drama of the past few years. With respect to the spec site, will there be more extensive collaboration before the EE4J move? ___ Kito D. Mann | @kito99 Expert training and consulting: PrimeFaces, PrimeNG, JSF, Java EE, Polymer, Web Components, Angular JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ed Burns <edburns@...> wrote: Hello Kito, |
|
|
|
Hi,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
As for the domain name, I have to agree with Ed and be careful about using anything with the name “java” in it. Once tEE4J (or whatever name the actual project will get) is fullly established, I’d love to see sub domains being used to somewhat emphasise the correlation between the specs. Eg Etc (The JSF and jpa names are not decided either but just as placeholder) Just my 2 cents Kind regards, Arjan Tijms On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Ed Burns <edburns@...> wrote: Hello Kito, |
|
|
|
Hello Kito,
Thanks for reactivating that site. I hate to be the spoilsport here, but based on empirical observations, names that start with "java" tend to be at risk for Oracle asserting their right to use that name. Therefore, I can only advise option 3: KM> (3) Scrap javaserverfaces.com and update the spec site collaboratively (once it moves to EE4J?) Thanks, Ed |
|
|
|
Hello, As many of you know, javaserverfaces.com has been out of date for quite some time. I had a contractor of mine create a new version of the site using Jekyll and github so we could have something more collaborative and easy to maintain. The first draft of the site is finished, but still needs to be updated with new content and cleaned up a bit: http://dev.javaserverfaces.com. I started this initiative before the EE4J news, in order to give the community an easy way to update the site. However, with the move to EE4J, it's possible the main JSF spec site may be easier for the community to edit collaboritvely. So, basically, I see three options here: (1) Update javaserverfaces.com as originally planned; separate from the JSF spec site (2) Use javaserveraces.com as the starting point for the new JSF spec site once it has been moved to EE4J (3) Scrap javaserverfaces.com and update the spec site collaboratively (once it moves to EE4J?) Thoughts? ___ Kito D. Mann | @kito99 Expert training and consulting: PrimeFaces, PrimeNG, JSF, Java EE, Polymer, Web Components, Angular JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com |
|
|
|
Neil Griffin
Hi Kito,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks indeed for doing this. It is very important to have a modern look and updated content. But the number of sites and URLs are just too much, too much: * The site you are updating which has easy to remember URLs: http://www.javaserverfaces.com (also dot org) * The Mojarra site, which has a URL that isn't quite as easy to remember: https://javaserverfaces.github.io/ * The Spec site, which has a URL that is difficult (for me, at least) to remember: https://javaee.github.io/javaserverfaces-spec/ I vote for #2 in order to unify all the sites with an easy to remember URL. Neil On 10/31/17 8:05 AM, Josh Juneau wrote:
Hi Kito, |
|
|